ECG vs. QQQM
ECG (Everus Construction Group Inc) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past year, ECG returned 78.75% vs 24.86% for QQQM. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
ECG vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ECG achieves a 46.60% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 12.29% return.
ECG
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- 6M
- 41.74%
- YTD
- 46.60%
- 1Y
- 78.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 91.65%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.92%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.82M | $76.45M | $96.15M | |
| $962.22M | $908.74M | $1.19B |
ECG vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ECG Everus Construction Group Inc | 46.60% | 30.13% | 64.17% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 12.29% | 20.85% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ECG and QQQM is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ECG and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ECG vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
ECG
QQQM
ECG vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ECG | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.88 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 6.01 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ECG vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ECG drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ECG and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ECG | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -35.04% | -21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.46% | -11.96% | -23.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.85% | -7.69% | -18.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.14% | -8.15% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.23% | 3.74% | +6.49% |
Volatility
ECG vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) has a higher volatility of 22.82% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.83%. This indicates that ECG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ECG | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.82% | 6.83% | +15.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.17% | 15.91% | +34.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.55% | 19.24% | +43.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.03% | 22.74% | +43.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.03% | 22.32% | +43.71% |
Dividends
ECG vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
ECG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECG Everus Construction Group Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ECG and QQQM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECG has higher volatility (22.82%) compared to QQQM (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ECG dropped -56.23% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ECG and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer