EAT vs. ATZ.TO
EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) and ATZ.TO (Aritzia Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — EAT in Restaurants, ATZ.TO in Apparel Retail. Over the past 5 years, EAT returned 21.19%/yr vs 34.44%/yr for ATZ.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EAT is traded in USD, while ATZ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATZ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EAT achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than ATZ.TO's 40.75% return.
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -8.74%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
ATZ.TO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 18.58%
- YTD
- 40.75%
- 6M
- 45.97%
- 1Y
- 151.51%
- 3Y*
- 64.97%
- 5Y*
- 34.44%
- 10Y*
- —
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc. | 40.75% | 130.10% | 79.16% | -40.51% | -14.94% | 103.09% | 38.67% | 21.15% | 19.21% | -22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EAT and ATZ.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2016 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
EAT:
$7.09B
ATZ.TO:
CA$20.25B
EAT:
$10.14
ATZ.TO:
CA$3.19
EAT:
15.71
ATZ.TO:
52.81
EAT:
0.36
ATZ.TO:
1.05
EAT:
1.27
ATZ.TO:
5.45
EAT:
17.46
ATZ.TO:
14.88
EAT:
$5.73B
ATZ.TO:
CA$3.70B
EAT:
$3.45B
ATZ.TO:
CA$1.65B
EAT:
$807.20M
ATZ.TO:
CA$736.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EAT vs. ATZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EAT
ATZ.TO
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EAT | ATZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.55 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 6.51 | -6.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 18.75 | -19.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EAT drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than ATZ.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAT and ATZ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EAT | ATZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.40% | -68.29% | -20.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.41% | -22.22% | -22.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.92% | -46.23% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.54% | -68.29% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.77% | 0.00% | -15.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.33% | -21.44% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.77% | 7.70% | +14.07% |
Volatility
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a higher volatility of 15.23% compared to Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) at 10.34%. This indicates that EAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EAT | ATZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.23% | 10.34% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.27% | 30.40% | +5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.95% | 36.88% | +10.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.04% | 47.26% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.13% | 43.72% | +11.41% |
Dividends
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither EAT nor ATZ.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
Financials
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brinker International, Inc. and Aritzia Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EAT vs. ATZ.TO - Profitability Comparison
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
ATZ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a gross profit of 507.19M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
ATZ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported an operating income of 183.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
ATZ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a net income of 134.27M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EAT and ATZ.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EAT and ATZ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer