ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO).

XEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Aug 7, 2019.

Performance

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc.	-3.26%	119.59%	94.33%	-41.92%	-9.55%	102.99%	35.38%	7.93%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	0.66%	19.47%	24.36%	17.25%	-11.01%	18.94%	11.82%	9.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATZ.TO achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 0.66% return.

ATZ.TO

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: -6.01%
• YTD: -3.26%
• 6M: 34.85%
• 1Y: 124.44%
• 3Y*: 37.81%
• 5Y*: 29.46%
• 10Y*: —

XEQT.TO

• 1D: 2.80%
• 1M: -4.49%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 2.68%
• 1Y: 20.05%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATZ.TO

ATZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ATZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ATZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ATZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ATZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

XEQT.TO

XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATZ.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	1.26	+1.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	1.76	+1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.27	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.74	1.75	+2.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	7.85	+5.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATZ.TO and XEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATZ.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	1.26	+1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.91	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.85	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between ATZ.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ATZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	1.66%	1.66%	2.01%	2.07%	2.12%	1.64%	1.66%	1.19%

Drawdowns

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -64.82%, which is greater than XEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATZ.TO and XEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATZ.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.82%	-29.74%	-35.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.02%	-11.78%	-14.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.82%	-19.56%	-45.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.59%	-5.08%	-12.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.46%	-4.20%	-16.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.05%	2.63%	+6.42%

Volatility

ATZ.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.85% compared to iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) at 6.01%. This indicates that ATZ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATZ.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.85%	6.01%	+7.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.30%	9.46%	+18.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.78%	15.98%	+32.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.33%	13.03%	+33.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.00%	15.63%	+27.37%