ATZ.TO vs. LULU
ATZ.TO (Aritzia Inc.) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Apparel Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, ATZ.TO returned 39.74%/yr vs -15.13%/yr for LULU. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATZ.TO is traded in CAD, while LULU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LULU values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATZ.TO achieves a 36.63% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -38.58% return.
ATZ.TO
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 14.94%
- YTD
- 36.63%
- 6M
- 45.10%
- 1Y
- 135.41%
- 3Y*
- 63.82%
- 5Y*
- 39.74%
- 10Y*
- —
LULU
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -38.58%
- 6M
- -31.13%
- 1Y
- -61.88%
- 3Y*
- -29.06%
- 5Y*
- -15.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.25%
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc. | 36.63% | 119.59% | 94.33% | -41.92% | -9.55% | 102.99% | 35.38% | 16.16% | 29.24% | -27.49% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -38.58% | -48.15% | -18.78% | 56.07% | -12.32% | 11.46% | 47.69% | 81.14% | 67.86% | 13.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATZ.TO and LULU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
ATZ.TO:
CA$3.19
LULU:
$14.61
ATZ.TO:
50.25
LULU:
8.62
ATZ.TO:
1.00
LULU:
0.42
ATZ.TO:
5.18
LULU:
1.36
ATZ.TO:
CA$3.70B
LULU:
$11.07B
ATZ.TO:
CA$1.65B
LULU:
$6.47B
ATZ.TO:
CA$736.90M
LULU:
$2.95B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATZ.TO vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
ATZ.TO
LULU
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATZ.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 0.71 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.87 | -0.97 | +6.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | -1.35 | +17.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATZ.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68 | -1.32 | +4.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | -0.37 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.51 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -64.82%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -76.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATZ.TO and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATZ.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.82% | -76.07% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | -64.28% | +41.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.84% | -76.07% | +29.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.82% | -76.07% | +11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -74.41% | +74.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.16% | -18.47% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 45.93% | -37.74% |
Volatility
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 9.60%. This indicates that ATZ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATZ.TO | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.91% | 9.60% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.48% | 31.30% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.09% | 47.26% | -10.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 41.04% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.04% | 39.64% | +3.40% |
Dividends
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATZ.TO nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aritzia Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATZ.TO vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
ATZ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a gross profit of 507.19M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.43B and revenue of 2.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
ATZ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported an operating income of 183.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 444.69M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
ATZ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a net income of 134.27M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 306.84M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATZ.TO and LULU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATZ.TO and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer