ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO).

Performance

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc.	-3.26%	119.59%	94.33%	-41.92%	-9.55%	102.99%	35.38%	16.16%	29.24%	-27.49%
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation	-2.89%	17.45%	57.53%	28.33%	5.83%	11.57%	-8.03%	41.99%	-23.25%	13.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATZ.TO : CA$13.59B MFC.TO : CA$80.94B
EPS ATZ.TO : CA$2.92 MFC.TO : CA$3.40
PE Ratio ATZ.TO : 38.91 MFC.TO : 14.10
PEG Ratio ATZ.TO : 0.19 MFC.TO : 4.95
PS Ratio ATZ.TO : 3.96 MFC.TO : 1.54
PB Ratio ATZ.TO : 10.13 MFC.TO : 1.83
Total Revenue (TTM) ATZ.TO : CA$3.41B MFC.TO : CA$53.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) ATZ.TO : CA$1.52B MFC.TO : CA$17.54B
EBITDA (TTM) ATZ.TO : CA$635.63M MFC.TO : CA$6.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATZ.TO achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than MFC.TO's -2.89% return.

ATZ.TO

• 1D: 4.96%
• 1M: -6.01%
• YTD: -3.26%
• 6M: 34.85%
• 1Y: 124.44%
• 3Y*: 37.81%
• 5Y*: 29.46%
• 10Y*: —

MFC.TO

• 1D: 2.31%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: -2.89%
• 6M: 12.62%
• 1Y: 11.15%
• 3Y*: 30.35%
• 5Y*: 17.45%
• 10Y*: 15.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATZ.TO

ATZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ATZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ATZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ATZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ATZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

MFC.TO

MFC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 56
MFC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MFC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MFC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MFC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MFC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATZ.TO	MFC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	0.46	+2.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	0.73	+2.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.11	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.74	0.74	+4.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	2.01	+11.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the MFC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATZ.TO and MFC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATZ.TO	MFC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	0.46	+2.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.82	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	-0.75	+1.26

Correlation

The correlation between ATZ.TO and MFC.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Dividend Comparison

ATZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATZ.TO Aritzia Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation	3.77%	3.53%	3.62%	4.99%	5.47%	4.85%	5.83%	3.79%	4.70%	3.13%	3.09%	3.21%

Drawdowns

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -64.82%, smaller than the maximum MFC.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATZ.TO and MFC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATZ.TO	MFC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.82%	-100.00%	+35.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.02%	-17.63%	-8.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.82%	-21.05%	-43.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.59%	-99.98%	+82.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.46%	-99.95%	+79.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.05%	6.52%	+2.53%

Volatility

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.85% compared to Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) at 6.10%. This indicates that ATZ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATZ.TO	MFC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.85%	6.10%	+7.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.30%	13.94%	+14.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.78%	24.52%	+24.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.33%	21.36%	+24.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.00%	26.15%	+16.85%

Financials

ATZ.TO vs. MFC.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aritzia Inc. and Manulife Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ATZ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a gross profit of 471.80M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.

MFC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.54B and revenue of 8.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.0%.

ATZ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported an operating income of 169.65M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

MFC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 8.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.

ATZ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a net income of 138.89M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

MFC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.56B and revenue of 8.60B, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.