EASG vs. IDHQ
EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and IDHQ (Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EASG tracks the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index while IDHQ tracks the IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EASG returned 7.16%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for IDHQ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for IDHQ.
Performance
EASG vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than IDHQ's 23.96% return.
EASG
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 19.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
IDHQ
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- YTD
- 23.96%
- 1Y
- 34.45%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
EASG vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 9.60% | 25.19% | 2.26% | 18.80% | -16.94% | 11.36% | 10.73% | 23.66% | -5.41% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 23.96% | 27.46% | 1.33% | 18.80% | -20.23% | 11.38% | 16.09% | 29.58% | -4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EASG and IDHQ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EASG and IDHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EASG vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank
EASG
IDHQ
EASG vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EASG | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.58 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 10.14 | -4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EASG vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and IDHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EASG | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -73.84% | +41.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.74% | -13.44% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.14% | -14.07% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.42% | -33.54% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -2.57% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -21.09% | +14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.41% | -0.24% |
Volatility
EASG vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 5.08%, while Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EASG | IDHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 7.92% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | 18.93% | -5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 20.78% | -4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 17.85% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 17.97% | +0.38% |
EASG vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EASG vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison
EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than IDHQ's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 3.88% | 4.18% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDHQ Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF | 2.04% | 2.46% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 3.33% | 2.10% | 1.60% | 2.10% | 2.67% | 1.68% | 2.36% | 1.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EASG and IDHQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IDHQ has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to EASG (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.
On 5-year performance, IDHQ leads with 9.11% vs 7.16% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 9.11% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for IDHQ.
EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 2.04% for IDHQ.
EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while IDHQ tracks IDHQ-US - S&P Quality Developed Ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.29% for IDHQ.
IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EASG and IDHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer