EASG vs. GSID

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and GSID (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EASG tracks the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index while GSID tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EASG returned 7.51%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for GSID. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GSID.

Performance

EASG vs. GSID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than GSID's 11.93% return.

EASG

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 5.95%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.53%

GSID

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 1.26%
• 6M: 6.67%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 1Y: 25.33%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	$107.99K	$79.19K	$91.05K
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	$4.14M	$2.75M	$2.25M

EASG vs. GSID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	11.08%	25.19%	2.26%	18.80%	-16.94%	11.36%	35.70%
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	11.93%	31.77%	3.60%	17.63%	-14.77%	10.67%	35.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and GSID is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020	0.97

The correlation between EASG and GSID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EASG vs. GSID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EASG	GSID
Financial Services	24.7%	26.0%
Industrials	17.5%	19.0%
Technology	14.8%	11.3%
Healthcare	11.0%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	6.6%
Basic Materials	5.7%	6.0%
Communication Services	5.2%	3.6%
Utilities	3.7%	3.6%
Energy	2.7%	3.9%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.9%

Return for Risk

EASG vs. GSID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 59
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

GSID

GSID Risk / Return Rank: 69
GSID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
GSID Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GSID Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GSID Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GSID Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EASG vs. GSID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EASG	GSID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.62	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.33	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	2.26	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.39	8.49	-1.10

EASG vs. GSID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the GSID Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and GSID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EASG vs. GSID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than GSID's maximum drawdown of -29.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and GSID.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASG	GSID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	-29.89%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-11.34%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.14%	-13.96%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.42%	-29.89%	-1.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-0.86%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-5.61%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	3.01%	+0.11%

Volatility

EASG vs. GSID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 4.39%, while Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF (GSID) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EASG	GSID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	4.80%	-0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.55%	13.74%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	15.81%	+0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.78%	16.36%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	16.32%	+2.00%

EASG vs. GSID - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GSID's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EASG vs. GSID - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than GSID's 2.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.83%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%
GSID Goldman Sachs MarketBeta International Equity ETF	2.43%	2.64%	2.90%	2.59%	2.57%	2.93%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASG and GSID in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, EASG and GSID move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EASG or GSID?

GSID has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to EASG (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs GSID's -29.89%.

Which ETF is better, EASG or GSID?

On 5-year performance, GSID leads with 9.10% vs 7.51% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EASG or GSID?

Over the 5-year period, GSID has performed better with a 9.10% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EASG or GSID?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GSID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EASG or GSID?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.43% for GSID.

What is the main difference between EASG and GSID?

EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while GSID tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.20% for GSID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.