PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EASG vs. EVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EASG vs. EVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than EVUS's 10.02% return.


EASG

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.70%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.16%
1Y
23.38%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*

EVUS

1D
0.43%
1M
0.44%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.44%
1Y
21.71%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. EVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
10.59%25.19%2.26%7.71%
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
10.02%13.31%14.23%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and EVUS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.69

The correlation between EASG and EVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EASG vs. EVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG
EASG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

EVUS
EVUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. EVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EASGEVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.82

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.41

11.81

-4.40

EASG vs. EVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the EVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and EVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EASG vs. EVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than EVUS's maximum drawdown of -15.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and EVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EASGEVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.06%

-15.65%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-7.72%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.14%

-15.65%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.97%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-2.75%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

1.84%

+1.32%

Volatility

EASG vs. EVUS - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) at 3.27%. This indicates that EASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EASGEVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

3.27%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

8.21%

+4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

10.71%

+5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

12.73%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

12.73%

+5.63%

EASG vs. EVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EVUS's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EASG vs. EVUS - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than EVUS's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EASG
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF
3.84%4.18%2.93%2.51%2.47%2.69%1.70%2.94%0.85%
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
1.53%1.62%1.99%2.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EASG and EVUS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EASG has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to EVUS (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs EVUS's -15.65%.

On 3-year performance, EVUS leads with 15.77% vs 14.91% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EVUS has performed better with a 15.77% return vs 14.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EVUS.

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 1.53% for EVUS.

EASG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EVUS is Large Cap Value Equities. EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while EVUS tracks MSCI USA Value Extended ESG Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.18% for EVUS.

EVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EASG and EVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer