Correlation
The correlation between EASG and FEDM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
EASG vs. FEDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM).
EASG and FEDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EASG is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2018. FEDM is a passively managed fund by FlexShares that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021. Both EASG and FEDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EASG or FEDM.
Performance
EASG vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
EASG:
0.48
FEDM:
0.74
EASG:
0.72
FEDM:
1.08
EASG:
1.09
FEDM:
1.14
EASG:
0.47
FEDM:
0.80
EASG:
1.26
FEDM:
2.26
EASG:
6.00%
FEDM:
5.07%
EASG:
17.54%
FEDM:
16.85%
EASG:
-32.06%
FEDM:
-29.37%
EASG:
-0.57%
FEDM:
-0.34%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than FEDM's 15.28% return.
EASG
13.43%
4.12%
9.56%
8.27%
9.70%
9.81%
N/A
FEDM
15.28%
4.66%
11.45%
12.32%
9.74%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EASG vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EASG vs. FEDM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EASG
FEDM
EASG vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EASG vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison
EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, which matches FEDM's 2.61% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 2.59% | 2.94% | 2.51% | 2.48% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.86% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.61% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EASG vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, which is greater than FEDM's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and FEDM.
Loading data...
Volatility
EASG vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) at 3.25%. This indicates that EASG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...