EASG vs. DBJP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EASG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EASG returned 7.00%/yr vs 21.61%/yr for DBJP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.

Performance

EASG vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EASG achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 21.03% return.

EASG

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 8.27%
• 6M: 8.01%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 7.00%
• 10Y*: —

DBJP

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 21.03%
• 6M: 21.10%
• 1Y: 53.92%
• 3Y*: 28.45%
• 5Y*: 21.61%
• 10Y*: 17.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	8.27%	25.19%	2.26%	18.80%	-16.94%	11.36%	10.73%	23.66%	-5.41%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	21.03%	29.51%	25.53%	36.21%	-4.19%	13.04%	10.53%	20.87%	-8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and DBJP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2018	0.71

The correlation between EASG and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

EASG vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EASG	DBJP
Financial Services	24.6%	17.0%
Industrials	18.1%	24.5%
Technology	13.2%	21.7%
Healthcare	10.9%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	3.3%
Basic Materials	6.1%	3.4%
Communication Services	5.7%	8.9%
Utilities	3.7%	1.0%
Energy	3.0%	0.9%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

EASG vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 37
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 88
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EASG	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	2.72	-1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	3.58	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.49	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	5.22	-3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.26	19.97	-13.70

EASG vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EASG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EASG and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EASG vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EASG drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, roughly equal to the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EASG and DBJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EASG	DBJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	-31.30%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-10.39%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.14%	-21.50%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.42%	-21.50%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-4.33%	+2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-7.27%	+1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	2.71%	+0.46%

Volatility

EASG vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) is 5.32%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that EASG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EASG	DBJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	7.92%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.30%	15.56%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	19.90%	-3.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.74%	19.18%	-2.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	19.31%	-0.94%

EASG vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

EASG vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than DBJP's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	1.25%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.93%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASG and DBJP in my portfolio?

EASG and DBJP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EASG or DBJP?

DBJP has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to EASG (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EASG dropped -32.06% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

Which ETF is better, EASG or DBJP?

On 5-year performance, DBJP leads with 21.61% vs 7.00% for EASG. On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EASG has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EASG or DBJP?

Over the 5-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 21.61% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EASG or DBJP?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EASG or DBJP?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 1.25% for DBJP.

What is the main difference between EASG and DBJP?

EASG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBJP is Japan Equities. EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.45% for DBJP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.