PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBJP vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBJP vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 17.99% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 19.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DBJP has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 16.44%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.44% annualized return.


DBJP

1D
-0.92%
1M
-2.77%
6M
11.32%
YTD
17.99%
1Y
44.05%
3Y*
27.19%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
16.44%
ALL TIME*
13.89%

DXJ

1D
-1.70%
1M
-2.32%
6M
11.80%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
46.73%
3Y*
30.24%
5Y*
26.79%
10Y*
18.44%
ALL TIME*
9.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.65M$4.86M$4.82M
$74.17M$64.25M$59.52M

DBJP vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
17.99%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%21.24%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
19.19%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and DXJ is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011

0.92

The correlation between DBJP and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBJP vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBJP
DXJ

Technology

24.9%
12.9%

Industrials

22.8%
29.5%

Financial Services

17.6%
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
13.3%

Communication Services

8.1%
2.3%

Healthcare

5.3%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.7%

Basic Materials

3.1%
9.1%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.0%
0.1%

Energy

0.8%
1.7%

Technology

DBJP
24.9%
DXJ
12.9%

Industrials

DBJP
22.8%
DXJ
29.5%

Financial Services

DBJP
17.6%
DXJ
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DBJP
11.2%
DXJ
13.3%

Communication Services

DBJP
8.1%
DXJ
2.3%

Healthcare

DBJP
5.3%
DXJ
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBJP
3.4%
DXJ
4.7%

Basic Materials

DBJP
3.1%
DXJ
9.1%

Real Estate

DBJP
1.9%
DXJ

-

Utilities

DBJP
1.0%
DXJ
0.1%

Energy

DBJP
0.8%
DXJ
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBJP vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBJP vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBJPDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

4.28

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

15.89

-1.30

DBJP vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBJP and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBJPDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-49.63%

+18.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-10.98%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-22.19%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-22.19%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

-39.14%

+7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.73%

-5.05%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-14.24%

+6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.95%

+0.08%

Volatility

DBJP vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBJPDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

6.27%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.97%

14.45%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.02%

18.12%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

19.09%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

19.91%

-0.65%

DBJP vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBJP vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than DXJ's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
1.29%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
0.98%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DBJP and DXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBJP has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to DXJ (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.44% vs 16.44% for DBJP. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.44% return vs 16.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.98% for DXJ.

DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBJP and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer