DBJP vs. DXJ
DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both Japan Equities funds - DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index while DXJ tracks the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBJP returned 17.99%/yr vs 19.68%/yr for DXJ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBJP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
DBJP vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 26.50% return, which is significantly higher than DXJ's 24.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DBJP has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 17.99%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 19.68% annualized return.
DBJP
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 26.50%
- 6M
- 26.96%
- 1Y
- 61.50%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 22.89%
- 10Y*
- 17.99%
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 24.69%
- 6M
- 25.08%
- 1Y
- 62.02%
- 3Y*
- 33.27%
- 5Y*
- 27.62%
- 10Y*
- 19.68%
DBJP vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 26.50% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 24.69% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBJP and DXJ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DBJP and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DBJP vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBJP
DXJ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
DBJP
DXJ
Technology
DBJP
DXJ
Financial Services
DBJP
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
DBJP
DXJ
Communication Services
DBJP
DXJ
Healthcare
DBJP
DXJ
Basic Materials
DBJP
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
DBJP
DXJ
Real Estate
DBJP
DXJ
-
Utilities
DBJP
DXJ
Energy
DBJP
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBJP vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
DBJP
DXJ
DBJP vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBJP | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.63 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 5.68 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.89 | 22.03 | +0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBJP vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBJP | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.30% | -49.63% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.39% | -10.98% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.50% | -22.19% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.50% | -22.19% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.30% | -39.14% | +7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.27% | -14.31% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.82% | -0.13% |
Volatility
DBJP vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.92%. This indicates that DBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBJP | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.27% | 4.92% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.86% | 13.55% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 17.78% | +1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 19.01% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 20.12% | -0.68% |
DBJP vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBJP vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than DXJ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 1.20% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.04% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DBJP and DXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DBJP has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to DXJ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 19.68% vs 17.99% for DBJP. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 19.68% return vs 17.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
DBJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.04% for DXJ.
DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBJP and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer