PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBJP vs. FLJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBJP vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBJP vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
9.63%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.82%1.14%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
9.29%25.26%25.89%36.02%-2.75%12.68%10.65%20.34%-14.66%1.26%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBJP having a 9.63% return and FLJH slightly lower at 9.29%.


DBJP

1D
2.73%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
9.63%
6M
22.76%
1Y
45.69%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
19.11%
10Y*
15.47%

FLJH

1D
2.72%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
9.29%
6M
17.51%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBJP vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBJP vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJH
FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBJP vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBJPFLJHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.77

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

2.43

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.32

+0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.11

12.34

+1.77

DBJP vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBJP and FLJH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBJPFLJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.77

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

1.00

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.69

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and FLJH is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DBJP vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FLJH's 3.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.57%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%
FLJH
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
3.57%3.90%5.06%25.59%26.67%1.29%0.00%0.00%5.92%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and FLJH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBJPFLJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-31.51%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-11.83%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-20.39%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-5.01%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-5.39%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.19%

-0.03%

Volatility

DBJP vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) have volatilities of 7.74% and 7.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBJPFLJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

7.76%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

14.50%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

23.00%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

18.50%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

19.90%

-0.12%