PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBJP vs. BBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBJP vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBJP achieves a 19.08% return, which is significantly higher than BBJP's 13.15% return.


DBJP

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.87%
6M
13.49%
YTD
19.08%
1Y
45.39%
3Y*
26.50%
5Y*
21.84%
10Y*
16.78%
ALL TIME*
13.96%

BBJP

1D
-1.02%
1M
-0.85%
6M
6.68%
YTD
13.15%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$141.13M$109.57M$116.57M
$2.67M$5.11M$4.76M

DBJP vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
19.08%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-14.51%
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
13.15%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%18.85%-13.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DBJP and BBJP is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.86

The correlation between DBJP and BBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBJP vs. BBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBJP
BBJP

Technology

24.9%
21.5%

Industrials

22.8%
25.8%

Financial Services

17.6%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.5%

Communication Services

8.1%
4.5%

Healthcare

5.3%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.1%

Utilities

1.0%
1.0%

Energy

0.8%
0.9%

Technology

DBJP
24.9%
BBJP
21.5%

Industrials

DBJP
22.8%
BBJP
25.8%

Financial Services

DBJP
17.6%
BBJP
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DBJP
11.2%
BBJP
10.5%

Communication Services

DBJP
8.1%
BBJP
4.5%

Healthcare

DBJP
5.3%
BBJP
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

DBJP
3.4%
BBJP
3.6%

Basic Materials

DBJP
3.1%
BBJP
3.9%

Real Estate

DBJP
1.9%
BBJP
2.1%

Utilities

DBJP
1.0%
BBJP
1.0%

Energy

DBJP
0.8%
BBJP
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBJP vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBJP vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBJPBBJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

2.16

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.40

6.93

+7.47

DBJP vs. BBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the BBJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBJP and BBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBJP vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBJP drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, roughly equal to the maximum BBJP drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBJP and BBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBJPBBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-32.66%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.39%

-13.60%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-14.49%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-32.66%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.87%

-4.56%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-8.43%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

4.24%

-1.24%

Volatility

DBJP vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is 6.41%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that DBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBJPBBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

7.62%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.94%

17.40%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.03%

20.65%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.24%

18.56%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

18.47%

+0.80%

DBJP vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBJP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBJP vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison

DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than BBJP's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.74%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
1.27%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, DBJP and BBJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBJP has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to DBJP (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBJP dropped -31.30% vs BBJP's -32.66%.

On 5-year performance, DBJP leads with 21.84% vs 9.16% for BBJP. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 9.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 1.27% for DBJP.

DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index, while BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBJP and 0.19% for BBJP.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBJP and BBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer