EASG vs. CN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EASG (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EASG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while CN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EASG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

EASG vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EASG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 6M: 10.51%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 6.85%
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EASG vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	8.44%	25.19%	2.26%	18.80%	-16.94%	11.36%	10.73%	23.66%	-5.41%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EASG and CN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018	0.45

The correlation between EASG and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EASG vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EASG	CN
Financial Services	23.5%	55.1%
Industrials	18.5%	1.0%
Technology	12.8%	0.3%
Healthcare	10.3%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	0.3%
Basic Materials	6.0%	0.6%
Communication Services	5.6%	0.4%
Utilities	4.7%	0.2%
Energy	3.4%	0.9%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.8%

Return for Risk

EASG vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EASG

EASG Risk / Return Rank: 35
EASG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EASG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EASG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
EASG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
EASG Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EASG vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EASG	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EASG	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EASG	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EASG	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.55%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.64%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	—	—

EASG vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EASG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EASG vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF	3.86%	4.18%	2.93%	2.51%	2.47%	2.69%	1.70%	2.94%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EASG and CN in my portfolio?

EASG and CN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EASG or CN?

On fees, EASG is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EASG or CN?

EASG is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EASG or CN?

EASG has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between EASG and CN?

EASG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CN is China Equities. EASG tracks MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for EASG and 0.50% for CN.