DXCM vs. PSQ
DXCM (DexCom, Inc.) is a stock, while PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). Over the past 10 years, DXCM returned 15.17%/yr vs -19.15%/yr for PSQ. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
DXCM vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXCM achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -14.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DXCM has outperformed PSQ with an annualized return of 15.17%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively lower -19.15% annualized return.
DXCM
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 22.29%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- -8.07%
- 3Y*
- -15.73%
- 5Y*
- -5.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
PSQ
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -14.02%
- 6M
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -24.40%
- 3Y*
- -17.58%
- 5Y*
- -13.78%
- 10Y*
- -19.15%
DXCM vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 13.56% | -14.66% | -37.33% | 9.58% | -15.64% | 45.23% | 69.02% | 82.59% | 108.75% | -3.87% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -14.02% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXCM and PSQ is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.43 |
The correlation between DXCM and PSQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.44 (5 years) to -0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXCM vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank
DXCM
PSQ
DXCM vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXCM | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.78 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | -0.87 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | -1.81 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXCM vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXCM drawdown since its inception was -94.61%, roughly equal to the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXCM and PSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXCM | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.61% | -98.26% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.75% | -26.86% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.95% | -49.65% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.32% | -60.91% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.32% | -88.98% | +22.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.71% | -98.20% | +44.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.02% | -73.99% | +37.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.77% | 12.96% | +9.81% |
Volatility
DXCM vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison
DexCom, Inc. (DXCM) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) at 7.39%. This indicates that DXCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXCM | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.27% | 7.39% | +5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.48% | 13.75% | +11.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.74% | 17.23% | +23.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.98% | 22.59% | +24.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.43% | 22.34% | +26.09% |
Dividends
DXCM vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison
DXCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM DexCom, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.09% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXCM and PSQ have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXCM has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to PSQ (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXCM dropped -94.61% vs PSQ's -98.26%.
DXCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.22 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXCM and PSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer