PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAW vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAW vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 14.00% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.70% return.


DWAW

1D
-3.01%
1M
1.62%
YTD
14.00%
6M
13.09%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-2.40%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.70%
6M
7.46%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAW vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
14.00%10.85%18.48%11.18%-17.80%3.49%48.87%24.93%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAW and SPYG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2019

0.84

The correlation between DWAW and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAW vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAW
SPYG

Technology

33.0%
52.1%

Financial Services

17.5%
9.0%

Industrials

11.3%
5.4%

Healthcare

7.7%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

6.0%
15.9%

Basic Materials

4.5%
0.3%

Energy

4.5%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
1.0%

Utilities

2.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.6%

Technology

DWAW
33.0%
SPYG
52.1%

Financial Services

DWAW
17.5%
SPYG
9.0%

Industrials

DWAW
11.3%
SPYG
5.4%

Healthcare

DWAW
7.7%
SPYG
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAW
7.5%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

DWAW
6.0%
SPYG
15.9%

Basic Materials

DWAW
4.5%
SPYG
0.3%

Energy

DWAW
4.5%
SPYG
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

DWAW
3.9%
SPYG
1.0%

Utilities

DWAW
2.8%
SPYG
1.2%

Real Estate

DWAW
1.4%
SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAW vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAW
DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAW vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWAWSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

1.96

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

7.79

+0.74

DWAW vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAW and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAW vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWAWSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.55%

-67.63%

+36.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-13.76%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.91%

-22.14%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-32.67%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.01%

-5.52%

+2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-24.28%

+13.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.46%

-0.56%

Volatility

DWAW vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 7.22% and 7.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWAWSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

7.26%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

13.90%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

17.26%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

21.36%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.57%

20.73%

+3.84%

DWAW vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAW vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
0.67%0.76%0.00%1.70%0.53%1.45%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAW and SPYG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to DWAW (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.11% vs 7.55% for DWAW. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.

DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.

DWAW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAW and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer