DWAW vs. MSOX
DWAW (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF) and MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DWAW returned 16.73%/yr vs -66.53%/yr for MSOX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWAW charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MSOX.
Performance
DWAW vs. MSOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than MSOX's -37.05% return.
DWAW
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- —
MSOX
- 1D
- 9.30%
- 1M
- -17.54%
- 6M
- -43.26%
- YTD
- -37.05%
- 1Y
- -29.50%
- 3Y*
- -66.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAW vs. MSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 13.27% | 10.85% | 18.48% | 11.18% | -2.16% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -37.05% | -51.20% | -87.32% | -39.26% | -76.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAW and MSOX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022 | 0.22 |
DWAW vs. MSOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAW
MSOX
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DWAW
MSOX
-
Financial Services
DWAW
MSOX
Industrials
DWAW
MSOX
-
Healthcare
DWAW
MSOX
-
Consumer Cyclical
DWAW
MSOX
-
Communication Services
DWAW
MSOX
-
Basic Materials
DWAW
MSOX
-
Energy
DWAW
MSOX
-
Consumer Defensive
DWAW
MSOX
-
Utilities
DWAW
MSOX
-
Real Estate
DWAW
MSOX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAW vs. MSOX — Risk / Return Rank
DWAW
MSOX
DWAW vs. MSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWAW | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | -0.35 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | -0.50 | +8.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWAW vs. MSOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum MSOX drawdown of -99.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and MSOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAW | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -99.75% | +68.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -84.89% | +73.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -98.83% | +75.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -99.58% | +95.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -89.04% | +78.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 59.62% | -56.65% |
Volatility
DWAW vs. MSOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) is 6.26%, while Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a volatility of 33.52%. This indicates that DWAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAW | MSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 33.52% | -27.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.59% | 112.31% | -97.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.99% | 220.61% | -203.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 167.49% | -148.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.51% | 167.49% | -142.98% |
DWAW vs. MSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAW vs. MSOX - Dividend Comparison
DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAW AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 0.53% | 1.45% | 0.16% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAW and MSOX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOX has higher volatility (33.52%) compared to DWAW (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAW dropped -31.55% vs MSOX's -99.75%.
On 3-year performance, DWAW leads with 16.73% vs -66.53% for MSOX. On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DWAW has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DWAW has performed better with a 16.73% return vs -66.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for DWAW.
DWAW has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.
DWAW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MSOX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for DWAW and 0.95% for MSOX.
DWAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAW and MSOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer