PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAW vs. MSOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DWAW vs. MSOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DWAW vs. MSOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
-2.84%10.85%18.48%11.18%-17.80%3.49%12.14%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
-24.79%23.88%-45.65%0.29%-72.68%-29.69%47.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAW achieves a -2.84% return, which is significantly higher than MSOS's -24.79% return.


DWAW

1D
3.53%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
-2.84%
6M
-1.46%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*

MSOS

1D
12.70%
1M
-8.51%
YTD
-24.79%
6M
-25.89%
1Y
36.02%
3Y*
-14.55%
5Y*
-39.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DWAW vs. MSOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAW has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOS's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DWAW vs. MSOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAW
DWAW Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DWAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAW Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAW Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAW vs. MSOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWAWMSOSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

0.33

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.42

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.66

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.24

1.32

+3.92

DWAW vs. MSOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAW Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the MSOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAW and MSOS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWAWMSOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.33

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

-0.52

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.40

+0.84

Correlation

The correlation between DWAW and MSOS is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DWAW vs. MSOS - Dividend Comparison

DWAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
DWAW
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF
0.78%0.76%0.00%1.70%0.53%1.45%0.16%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%0.00%

Drawdowns

DWAW vs. MSOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAW drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum MSOS drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAW and MSOS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DWAWMSOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.55%

-96.25%

+64.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-52.91%

+39.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.43%

-95.26%

+66.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.47%

-93.53%

+85.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-71.08%

+59.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

26.44%

-23.18%

Volatility

DWAW vs. MSOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright FSM All Cap World ETF (DWAW) is 7.99%, while AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a volatility of 22.69%. This indicates that DWAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DWAWMSOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.99%

22.69%

-14.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

79.95%

-67.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.14%

109.99%

-88.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

75.80%

-56.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

73.16%

-50.66%