DUNK vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DUNK (Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUNK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

DUNK vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DUNK

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 4.97%
• 6M: 10.50%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -3.48%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUNK vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DUNK Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF	-0.24%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	-5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DUNK and LRNZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

DUNK vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

DUNK vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUNK drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than LRNZ's maximum drawdown of -5.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUNK and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUNK	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-5.22%	-20.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.01%	-5.22%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.68%	-2.24%	-7.44%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DUNK	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.16%	36.71%	-14.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.16%	36.71%	-14.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.16%	36.71%	-14.55%

DUNK vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUNK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUNK vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither DUNK nor LRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUNK and LRNZ in my portfolio?

DUNK and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DUNK or LRNZ?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUNK or LRNZ?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DUNK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUNK or LRNZ?

DUNK and LRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DUNK and LRNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Dana and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DUNK and 0.68% for LRNZ.