PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUNK vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUNK vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUNK achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 26.21% return.


DUNK

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
-2.71%
6M
-3.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DARP

1D
-4.47%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
26.21%
6M
25.50%
1Y
68.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUNK vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DUNK
Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF
-2.71%-1.64%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
26.21%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DUNK and DARP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUNK vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUNK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUNK vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUNKDARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.69

DUNK vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUNK vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUNK drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUNK and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUNKDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-30.27%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.73%

-5.59%

-6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-4.64%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

Volatility

DUNK vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUNKDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

24.83%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

26.48%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

26.48%

-4.18%

DUNK vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DUNK and DARP have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

DUNK vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

DUNK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.34%0.43%1.93%0.32%
DUNK
Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUNK and DARP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DUNK and DARP have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for DUNK.

They also come from different issuers: Dana and Grizzle.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUNK and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer