DUG vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while NOBL is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DUG returned -32.42%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

DUG vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -44.70% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DUG has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -32.42%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.

DUG

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: -44.70%
• 6M: -42.64%
• 1Y: -53.44%
• 3Y*: -28.46%
• 5Y*: -38.28%
• 10Y*: -32.42%

NOBL

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.01%
• YTD: 3.51%
• 6M: 3.45%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUG vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	-44.70%	-18.63%	-6.13%	-2.28%	-72.98%	-68.12%	-24.59%	-23.47%	36.14%	-1.09%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.51%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DUG and NOBL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013	-0.54

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DUG and NOBL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.54 to -0.20, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

DUG vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUG	NOBL
Financial Services	35.8%	12.4%
Basic Materials	-	10.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	23.5%
Energy	-	3.4%
Healthcare	-	9.7%
Industrials	-	20.3%
Real Estate	-	4.6%
Technology	-	3.6%
Utilities	-	6.4%

Return for Risk

DUG vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUG

DUG Risk / Return Rank: 1
DUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
DUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
DUG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 22
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUG vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUG	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.31	0.80	-2.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.28	1.24	-3.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.14	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	0.99	-1.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.60	2.58	-4.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DUG vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUG Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUG and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUG	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.31	0.80	-2.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.74	0.35	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.55	0.57	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	0.64	-1.16

Drawdowns

DUG vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUG	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-35.43%	-64.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.89%	-9.11%	-50.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.64%	-15.36%	-53.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.03%	-17.92%	-76.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.46%	-35.43%	-64.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.92%	-5.99%	-93.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.97%	-3.48%	-85.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.39%	3.50%	+29.89%

Volatility

DUG vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) has a higher volatility of 16.20% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that DUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUG	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.20%	2.36%	+13.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.96%	8.00%	+24.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.91%	11.33%	+29.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.59%	14.38%	+37.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.81%	16.60%	+42.21%

DUG vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUG vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than NOBL's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	4.99%	3.21%	5.66%	4.16%	0.28%	0.00%	0.10%	0.56%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.12%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUG and NOBL in my portfolio?

DUG and NOBL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUG or NOBL?

DUG has higher volatility (16.20%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, DUG or NOBL?

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs -32.42% for DUG. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUG or NOBL?

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs -32.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUG or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUG or NOBL?

DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between DUG and NOBL?

DUG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is S&P 500. DUG tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.35% for NOBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.