PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRUP vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRUP vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.67% return.


DRUP

1D
-2.41%
1M
12.68%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
-2.39%
1Y
11.88%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
11.71%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRUP vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DRUP
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF
-1.00%18.18%23.11%42.32%-28.18%26.13%28.71%11.32%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DRUP and QUS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between DRUP and QUS has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DRUP vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRUP
QUS

Technology

55.8%
26.3%

Healthcare

20.8%
13.4%

Communication Services

19.8%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
5.8%

Financial Services

1.2%
14.6%

Industrials

1.1%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.2%

Energy

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Utilities

-

3.6%

Technology

DRUP
55.8%
QUS
26.3%

Healthcare

DRUP
20.8%
QUS
13.4%

Communication Services

DRUP
19.8%
QUS
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DRUP
1.3%
QUS
5.8%

Financial Services

DRUP
1.2%
QUS
14.6%

Industrials

DRUP
1.1%
QUS
8.6%

Basic Materials

DRUP

-

QUS
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

DRUP

-

QUS
9.2%

Energy

DRUP

-

QUS
4.6%

Real Estate

DRUP

-

QUS
1.4%

Utilities

DRUP

-

QUS
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRUP vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRUP
DRUP Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
DRUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRUP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DRUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRUP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRUP vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRUPQUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.95

-1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

2.81

-1.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

2.59

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.37

11.54

-10.17

DRUP vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRUP and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRUPQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.95

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.78

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.77

-0.09

Drawdowns

DRUP vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRUPQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-33.78%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-6.85%

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.77%

-13.94%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-22.30%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-0.50%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-3.70%

-4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

1.53%

+7.72%

Volatility

DRUP vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that DRUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRUPQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

1.78%

+5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.03%

6.66%

+9.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

9.09%

+10.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

14.33%

+7.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.22%

16.42%

+6.80%

DRUP vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRUP vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRUP
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRUP and QUS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRUP has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, DRUP leads with 11.71% vs 11.08% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DRUP has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.

DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRUP and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer