DRUP vs. MFUS
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DRUP tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 10.93%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
DRUP vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
DRUP vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and MFUS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DRUP and MFUS has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DRUP vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
MFUS
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRUP
MFUS
Healthcare
DRUP
MFUS
Communication Services
DRUP
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
MFUS
Financial Services
DRUP
MFUS
Industrials
DRUP
MFUS
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
MFUS
Energy
DRUP
-
MFUS
Real Estate
DRUP
-
MFUS
Utilities
DRUP
-
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
MFUS
DRUP vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRUP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 2.63 | -2.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 3.77 | -3.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.47 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 4.41 | -4.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 18.13 | -17.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRUP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.63 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.86 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.79 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -35.21% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -6.39% | -16.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -15.39% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -18.22% | -13.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | 0.00% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -4.00% | -4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 1.55% | +7.70% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) at 3.19%. This indicates that DRUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 3.19% | +4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 8.22% | +7.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 10.72% | +8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 15.03% | +6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 17.35% | +5.88% |
DRUP vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and MFUS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRUP has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to MFUS (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 10.93% for DRUP. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer