DRUP vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DRUP is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 10.93%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for IQM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

DRUP vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.

DRUP

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: -3.24%
• 6M: -4.85%
• 1Y: 8.51%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 10.93%
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRUP vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF	-3.24%	18.18%	23.11%	42.32%	-28.18%	26.13%	37.71%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	78.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DRUP and IQM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between DRUP and IQM has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DRUP vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRUP	IQM
Technology	55.8%	65.9%
Healthcare	20.8%	1.1%
Communication Services	19.8%	2.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.3%	4.1%
Financial Services	1.2%	-
Industrials	1.1%	19.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	2.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.3%

Return for Risk

DRUP vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRUP

DRUP Risk / Return Rank: 14
DRUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
DRUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DRUP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DRUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DRUP Martin Ratio Rank: 13

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRUP vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRUP	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	2.67	-2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	3.11	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.43	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	5.13	-4.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.92	16.79	-15.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DRUP vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRUP and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRUP	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	2.67	-2.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.77	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.96	-0.30

Drawdowns

DRUP vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRUP	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.29%	-44.91%	+13.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.21%	-14.71%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	-30.42%	+6.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.29%	-44.91%	+13.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-0.37%	-5.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-12.25%	+3.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.25%	4.49%	+4.76%

Volatility

DRUP vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is 7.48%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that DRUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRUP	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.48%	9.20%	-1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.17%	22.92%	-6.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.55%	28.27%	-8.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.78%	28.91%	-7.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.23%	30.72%	-7.49%

DRUP vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRUP vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRUP nor IQM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.51%	0.28%	0.53%	0.19%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRUP and IQM in my portfolio?

DRUP and IQM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRUP or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to DRUP (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, DRUP or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 10.93% for DRUP. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DRUP has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRUP or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRUP or IQM?

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRUP or IQM?

DRUP and IQM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DRUP and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.