PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DMXF vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DMXF vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.


DMXF

1D
-0.56%
1M
5.69%
YTD
11.52%
6M
13.01%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*

SPDW

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
15.00%
6M
18.06%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMXF vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
11.52%22.07%3.99%20.52%-19.25%10.90%23.13%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.00%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and SPDW is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.93

The correlation between DMXF and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DMXF vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DMXF
SPDW

Financial Services

31.6%
22.9%

Technology

18.3%
13.7%

Industrials

16.3%
19.2%

Healthcare

10.6%
8.3%

Communication Services

7.0%
3.8%

Basic Materials

4.8%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
7.8%

Real Estate

3.9%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
5.7%

Utilities

0.6%
3.3%

Energy

-

5.5%

Financial Services

DMXF
31.6%
SPDW
22.9%

Technology

DMXF
18.3%
SPDW
13.7%

Industrials

DMXF
16.3%
SPDW
19.2%

Healthcare

DMXF
10.6%
SPDW
8.3%

Communication Services

DMXF
7.0%
SPDW
3.8%

Basic Materials

DMXF
4.8%
SPDW
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DMXF
4.6%
SPDW
7.8%

Real Estate

DMXF
3.9%
SPDW
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

DMXF
2.3%
SPDW
5.7%

Utilities

DMXF
0.6%
SPDW
3.3%

Energy

DMXF

-

SPDW
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DMXF vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMXF
DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMXF vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DMXFSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.80

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

10.93

-4.77

DMXF vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DMXFSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.07

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.57

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.24

+0.41

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DMXFSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.52%

-60.02%

+25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-11.55%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.54%

-13.53%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-30.21%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.87%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-12.91%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.95%

+0.20%

Volatility

DMXF vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is 5.13%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that DMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DMXFSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

5.63%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

13.17%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.07%

15.60%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

16.49%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.26%

-0.01%

DMXF vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DMXF vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than SPDW's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF
4.35%4.85%2.92%2.29%2.37%1.91%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DMXF and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to DMXF (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 5-year performance, SPDW leads with 9.38% vs 6.83% for DMXF. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DMXF.

DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 2.87% for SPDW.

DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DMXF and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer