DMXF vs. VXUS
DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DMXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMXF returned 7.79%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMXF charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
DMXF vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 16.04% return.
DMXF
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 24.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 34.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
DMXF vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 14.88% | 22.07% | 3.99% | 20.52% | -19.25% | 10.90% | 22.80% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 16.04% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 23.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMXF and VXUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DMXF and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
DMXF vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMXF
VXUS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
-
Financial Services
DMXF
VXUS
Technology
DMXF
VXUS
Industrials
DMXF
VXUS
Healthcare
DMXF
VXUS
Communication Services
DMXF
VXUS
Basic Materials
DMXF
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
DMXF
VXUS
Real Estate
DMXF
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
DMXF
VXUS
Utilities
DMXF
VXUS
Energy
DMXF
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMXF vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
DMXF
VXUS
DMXF vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DMXF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.07 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 11.84 | -4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DMXF vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMXF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.52% | -35.97% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -11.27% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -13.58% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | -29.44% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -8.20% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 2.92% | +0.24% |
Volatility
DMXF vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is 5.58%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that DMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMXF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.58% | 6.28% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 14.10% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 16.08% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 16.21% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 17.18% | +0.13% |
DMXF vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DMXF vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than VXUS's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.15% | 4.85% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 2.37% | 1.91% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.51% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DMXF and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to DMXF (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.22% vs 7.79% for DMXF. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DMXF.
DMXF has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 2.51% for VXUS.
DMXF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. DMXF tracks MSCI EAFE Choice ESG Screened Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMXF and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer