DMXF vs. FNIDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) and FNIDX (Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DMXF returned 7.79%/yr vs 7.34%/yr for FNIDX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMXF charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FNIDX.

Performance

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than FNIDX's 11.99% return.

DMXF

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 14.88%
• 6M: 14.42%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 16.50%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: —

FNIDX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 28.65%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 7.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	14.88%	22.07%	3.99%	20.52%	-19.25%	10.90%	22.80%
FNIDX Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd	11.99%	29.80%	5.67%	14.65%	-18.89%	7.65%	22.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and FNIDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2020	0.90

The correlation between DMXF and FNIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DMXF vs. FNIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMXF

DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 44
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FNIDX

FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DMXF	FNIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.74	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.42	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.32	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	2.44	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	9.17	-1.41

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the FNIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and FNIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, roughly equal to the maximum FNIDX drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and FNIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMXF	FNIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.52%	-33.17%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	-11.36%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-14.92%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.52%	-32.79%	-1.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-8.22%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	3.01%	+0.15%

Volatility

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is 5.58%, while Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that DMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMXF	FNIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	6.61%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	13.69%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	15.91%	+0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	16.01%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	16.63%	+0.68%

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNIDX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DMXF vs. FNIDX - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than FNIDX's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	4.15%	4.85%	2.92%	2.29%	2.37%	1.91%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNIDX Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd	2.51%	2.81%	2.34%	2.64%	2.32%	1.93%	1.13%	2.17%	2.28%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMXF and FNIDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DMXF and FNIDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DMXF or FNIDX?

FNIDX has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to DMXF (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs FNIDX's -33.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.