DMXF vs. CGXU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF) and CGXU (Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DMXF is passively managed, while CGXU is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DMXF returned 16.50%/yr vs 18.53%/yr for CGXU. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMXF charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for CGXU.

Performance

DMXF vs. CGXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMXF achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly lower than CGXU's 21.86% return.

DMXF

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 14.88%
• 6M: 14.42%
• 1Y: 24.45%
• 3Y*: 16.50%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: —

CGXU

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 7.36%
• YTD: 21.86%
• 6M: 23.24%
• 1Y: 44.55%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMXF vs. CGXU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	14.88%	22.07%	3.99%	20.52%	-10.28%
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	21.86%	26.31%	4.36%	15.75%	-11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DMXF and CGXU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.90

The correlation between DMXF and CGXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

DMXF vs. CGXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DMXF	CGXU
Financial Services	31.8%	11.3%
Technology	21.3%	22.1%
Industrials	14.8%	14.4%
Healthcare	9.2%	4.0%
Communication Services	6.9%	12.4%
Basic Materials	4.9%	15.4%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	7.0%
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	4.5%
Utilities	0.7%	1.8%
Energy	-	7.1%

Return for Risk

DMXF vs. CGXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMXF

DMXF Risk / Return Rank: 44
DMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
DMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CGXU

CGXU Risk / Return Rank: 67
CGXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CGXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CGXU Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CGXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
CGXU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMXF vs. CGXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) and Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DMXF	CGXU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	2.11	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.83	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	3.41	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	12.37	-4.62

DMXF vs. CGXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the CGXU Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMXF and CGXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DMXF vs. CGXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMXF drawdown since its inception was -34.52%, which is greater than CGXU's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMXF and CGXU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMXF	CGXU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.52%	-25.64%	-8.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	-13.14%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	-21.63%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.25%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-6.61%	-1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	3.61%	-0.45%

Volatility

DMXF vs. CGXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) is 5.58%, while Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF (CGXU) has a volatility of 9.16%. This indicates that DMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMXF	CGXU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	9.16%	-3.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.14%	18.65%	-4.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.74%	21.29%	-4.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.79%	20.23%	-2.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	20.23%	-2.92%

DMXF vs. CGXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMXF has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CGXU's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

DMXF vs. CGXU - Dividend Comparison

DMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than CGXU's 4.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CGXU Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF	4.35%	5.31%	1.01%	0.99%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%
DMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF	4.15%	4.85%	2.92%	2.29%	2.37%	1.91%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DMXF and CGXU in my portfolio?

DMXF and CGXU have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DMXF or CGXU?

CGXU has higher volatility (9.16%) compared to DMXF (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMXF dropped -34.52% vs CGXU's -25.64%.

Which ETF is better, DMXF or CGXU?

On 3-year performance, CGXU leads with 18.53% vs 16.50% for DMXF. On fees, DMXF is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DMXF has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DMXF or CGXU?

Over the 3-year period, CGXU has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 16.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DMXF or CGXU?

DMXF is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CGXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DMXF or CGXU?

CGXU has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 4.15% for DMXF.

What is the main difference between DMXF and CGXU?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DMXF and 0.54% for CGXU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.