DIPS vs. QRMI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIPS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QRMI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -21.95% vs 9.91% for QRMI. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. DIPS charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QRMI.

Performance

DIPS vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's 2.46% return.

DIPS

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 6.84%
• YTD: -3.73%
• 6M: -2.35%
• 1Y: -21.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 9.91%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	-3.73%	-31.46%	-22.13%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.46%	3.76%	8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and QRMI is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	-0.53

The correlation between DIPS and QRMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DIPS vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS

DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 3
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 3

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIPS	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	1.67	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	2.26	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.34	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	1.97	-2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	8.61	-9.88

DIPS vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and QRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIPS	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.93%	-20.95%	-38.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.32%	-5.04%	-26.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.43%	-0.85%	-52.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.58%	-7.90%	-30.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.00%	1.15%	+17.85%

Volatility

DIPS vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 2.24%. This indicates that DIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIPS	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.86%	2.24%	+7.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.87%	4.92%	+16.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.79%	5.98%	+22.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.95%	8.35%	+29.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.95%	8.35%	+29.60%

DIPS vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIPS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIPS vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.51%, more than QRMI's 12.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	60.51%	96.20%	24.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.33%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIPS and QRMI in my portfolio?

DIPS and QRMI have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIPS or QRMI?

DIPS has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to QRMI (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs QRMI's -20.95%.

Which ETF is better, DIPS or QRMI?

On 1-year performance, QRMI leads with 9.91% vs -21.95% for DIPS. On fees, QRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIPS or QRMI?

Over the 1-year period, QRMI has performed better with a 9.91% return vs -21.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIPS or QRMI?

QRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DIPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIPS or QRMI?

DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 60.51%, compared with 12.33% for QRMI.

What is the main difference between DIPS and QRMI?

DIPS is categorized as Derivative Income, while QRMI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DIPS and 0.60% for QRMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.