QRMI vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QRMI is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QRMI returned 7.36%/yr vs 26.05%/yr for QQQ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QRMI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

QRMI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return.

QRMI

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 9.91%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 16.45%
• 6M: 14.99%
• 1Y: 34.88%
• 3Y*: 26.05%
• 5Y*: 16.01%
• 10Y*: 22.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.46%	3.76%	14.72%	11.73%	-18.50%	-2.40%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	16.45%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	6.40%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and QQQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.76

The correlation between QRMI and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QRMI vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QRMI	QQQ
Technology	62.0%	58.7%
Communication Services	13.3%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	6.4%
Healthcare	3.5%	3.7%
Industrials	3.5%	2.6%
Utilities	1.2%	1.2%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.0%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QRMI vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 51
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 53

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QRMI	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.95	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.57	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.35	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	2.93	-0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	10.86	-2.25

QRMI vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRMI	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-82.97%	+62.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	-11.96%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.43%	-22.77%	+14.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-4.25%	+3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.90%	-32.73%	+24.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	3.22%	-2.07%

Volatility

QRMI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 2.24%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRMI	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	9.17%	-6.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.92%	14.57%	-9.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.98%	17.96%	-11.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.35%	22.69%	-14.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.35%	22.42%	-14.07%

QRMI vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRMI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRMI vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.33%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.33%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRMI and QQQ in my portfolio?

QRMI and QQQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRMI or QQQ?

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to QRMI (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRMI dropped -20.95% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which ETF is better, QRMI or QQQ?

On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 26.05% vs 7.36% for QRMI. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QRMI or QQQ?

Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 26.05% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRMI or QQQ?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QRMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRMI or QQQ?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.33%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.

What is the main difference between QRMI and QQQ?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QRMI and 0.18% for QQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.