PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. QYLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QRMI vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QRMI vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.50%3.76%14.72%11.73%-18.50%-1.88%
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
-2.27%15.29%22.02%38.73%-26.27%4.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's -2.27% return.


QRMI

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*

QYLG

1D
0.82%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
-2.27%
6M
2.01%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRMI vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QRMI and QYLG have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLG
QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRMIQYLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

1.08

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

1.70

-1.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.26

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.85

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.59

9.05

-7.46

QRMI vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and QYLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRMIQYLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

1.08

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.67

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and QYLG is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QRMI vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, less than QYLG's 18.82% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.66%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%0.00%
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
18.82%17.93%25.27%5.43%6.91%10.15%1.44%

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum QYLG drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and QYLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMIQYLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-29.98%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-11.45%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-4.76%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-6.60%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.33%

-0.59%

Volatility

QRMI vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 3.02%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QRMIQYLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

5.88%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.93%

10.16%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.77%

18.87%

-11.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.46%

18.07%

-9.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.46%

18.09%

-9.63%