DIPS vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, DIPS returned -21.95% vs 38.94% for NVDA. At a correlation of -0.96, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

DIPS vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.39% return.

DIPS

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 6.84%
• YTD: -3.73%
• 6M: -2.35%
• 1Y: -21.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA

• 1D: -4.13%
• 1M: -6.99%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 5.85%
• 1Y: 38.94%
• 3Y*: 68.08%
• 5Y*: 59.90%
• 10Y*: 67.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	-3.73%	-31.46%	-22.13%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	7.39%	38.92%	9.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and NVDA is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	-0.96

The correlation between DIPS and NVDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DIPS vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS

DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 3
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 3

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 72
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIPS	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	1.10	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	1.65	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.20	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	1.94	-2.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	4.51	-5.78

DIPS vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIPS	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.93%	-89.72%	+29.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.32%	-20.21%	-11.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.43%	-15.04%	-38.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.58%	-36.16%	-2.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.00%	8.66%	+10.34%

Volatility

DIPS vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) is 9.86%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that DIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIPS	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.86%	13.29%	-3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.87%	26.92%	-5.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.79%	35.50%	-6.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.95%	51.84%	-13.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.95%	49.87%	-11.92%

Dividends

DIPS vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.51%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF	60.51%	96.20%	24.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIPS and NVDA in my portfolio?

DIPS and NVDA have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIPS or NVDA?

NVDA has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to DIPS (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.