DIPS vs. TSMY
DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -26.57% vs 92.13% for TSMY. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
DIPS vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.
DIPS
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- -26.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMY
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 37.04%
- 6M
- 39.21%
- 1Y
- 92.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPS vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.73% | -31.46% | -13.68% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.04% | 41.00% | 8.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIPS and TSMY is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | -0.63 |
The correlation between DIPS and TSMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.63 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIPS vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank
DIPS
TSMY
DIPS vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIPS | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.50 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 5.98 | -6.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 22.18 | -23.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIPS | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 3.21 | -4.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 1.56 | -2.42 |
Drawdowns
DIPS vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and TSMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIPS | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.93% | -31.15% | -28.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.97% | -15.50% | -18.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.85% | -1.37% | -54.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -5.51% | -32.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.49% | 4.17% | +15.32% |
Volatility
DIPS vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) at 9.52%. This indicates that DIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIPS | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 9.52% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 22.68% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.88% | 28.87% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 33.22% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 33.22% | +4.81% |
DIPS vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DIPS and TSMY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
DIPS vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison
DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, more than TSMY's 52.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 66.49% | 96.20% | 24.18% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 52.19% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIPS and TSMY have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIPS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to TSMY (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs TSMY's -31.15%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs -26.57% for DIPS. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 9.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIPS and TSMY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 66.49%, compared with 52.19% for TSMY.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIPS and TSMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer