PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRMI vs. QCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QRMI vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QRMI vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.50%3.76%14.72%11.73%-18.50%-1.88%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.98%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a -2.50% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's -5.98% return.


QRMI

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*

QCLR

1D
0.74%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-5.17%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QRMI vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QRMI and QCLR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

QRMI vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRMIQCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

0.95

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

1.41

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.14

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.59

4.57

-2.98

QRMI vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and QCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRMIQCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

0.95

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.55

-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and QCLR is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QRMI vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, less than QCLR's 15.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.66%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
15.83%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, roughly equal to the maximum QCLR drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and QCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QRMIQCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-21.77%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

-10.22%

+5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-8.10%

+4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-6.32%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

2.56%

-0.82%

Volatility

QRMI vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 3.02%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QRMIQCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

3.93%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.93%

8.56%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.77%

12.08%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.46%

12.61%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.46%

12.61%

-4.15%