QRMI vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QRMI (Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Global X. QRMI is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QRMI returned 7.02%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for QYLD. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.

Performance

QRMI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRMI achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.

QRMI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 9.73%
• 3Y*: 7.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.97%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRMI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	2.60%	3.76%	14.72%	11.73%	-18.50%	-1.88%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	9.28%	19.35%	22.77%	-19.08%	2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between QRMI and QYLD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021	0.80

The correlation between QRMI and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

QRMI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QRMI	QYLD
Technology	53.8%	53.8%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	2.8%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QRMI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 48
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 50

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRMI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRMI	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.80	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.92	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.63	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	4.84	-2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.52	28.36	-19.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRMI vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRMI and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRMI	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	2.80	-1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.59	-0.37

Drawdowns

QRMI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRMI drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRMI and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRMI	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-24.75%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.04%	-4.97%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.43%	-19.06%	+10.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.06%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-3.84%	-4.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	0.85%	+0.29%

Volatility

QRMI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) is 0.66%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that QRMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRMI	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.66%	1.85%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.43%	7.12%	-2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.76%	8.58%	-2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.34%	14.70%	-6.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.34%	15.49%	-7.15%

QRMI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QRMI and QYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.

Dividends

QRMI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

QRMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.19%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.19%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRMI and QYLD in my portfolio?

QRMI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRMI or QYLD?

QYLD has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to QRMI (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRMI dropped -20.95% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

Which ETF is better, QRMI or QYLD?

On 3-year performance, QYLD leads with 13.80% vs 7.02% for QRMI. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, QRMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QRMI or QYLD?

Over the 3-year period, QYLD has performed better with a 13.80% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QRMI or QYLD?

QRMI and QYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QRMI or QYLD?

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.19%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.