PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIPS vs. ULTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIPS vs. ULTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than ULTY's 11.14% return.


DIPS

1D
2.87%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-8.73%
6M
-11.40%
1Y
-26.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ULTY

1D
-1.25%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.14%
6M
9.84%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. ULTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DIPS
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
-8.73%-31.46%-23.19%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
11.14%-0.84%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and ULTY is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024

-0.55

The correlation between DIPS and ULTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.48 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIPS vs. ULTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS
DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

ULTY
ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. ULTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIPSULTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.08

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

0.34

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

0.67

-2.04

DIPS vs. ULTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the ULTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and ULTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIPSULTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

0.40

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

0.17

-1.04

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. ULTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than ULTY's maximum drawdown of -26.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and ULTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIPSULTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.93%

-26.85%

-33.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.97%

-24.16%

-9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.85%

-8.88%

-46.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-9.37%

-28.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.49%

12.31%

+7.18%

Volatility

DIPS vs. ULTY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) at 4.51%. This indicates that DIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIPSULTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

4.51%

+6.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.77%

15.03%

+5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.88%

20.79%

+7.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.03%

26.92%

+11.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.03%

26.92%

+11.11%

DIPS vs. ULTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIPS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ULTY's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIPS vs. ULTY - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, less than ULTY's 114.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIPS
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
66.49%96.20%24.18%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
114.67%142.99%111.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIPS and ULTY have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIPS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to ULTY (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs ULTY's -26.85%.

On 1-year performance, ULTY leads with 8.24% vs -26.57% for DIPS. On fees, DIPS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ULTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ULTY has performed better with a 8.24% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIPS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 114.67%, compared with 66.49% for DIPS.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DIPS and 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIPS and ULTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer