DHT vs. LNG
DHT (DHT Holdings, Inc.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, DHT returned 22.43%/yr vs 21.39%/yr for LNG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DHT vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHT achieves a 54.52% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 33.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DHT having a 22.43% annualized return and LNG not far behind at 21.39%.
DHT
- 1D
- 4.90%
- 1M
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 40.59%
- YTD
- 54.52%
- 1Y
- 74.34%
- 3Y*
- 37.73%
- 5Y*
- 32.02%
- 10Y*
- 22.43%
LNG
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 33.86%
- YTD
- 33.71%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 25.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.39%
DHT vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 54.52% | 40.04% | 3.58% | 24.07% | 73.87% | 1.41% | -20.52% | 118.96% | 11.32% | -9.26% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 33.71% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHT and LNG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2005 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DHT and LNG has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
DHT:
$2.86B
LNG:
$54.20B
DHT:
$2.06
LNG:
$6.86
DHT:
8.62
LNG:
37.72
DHT:
0.29
LNG:
0.20
DHT:
5.05
LNG:
2.74
DHT:
2.32
LNG:
14.50
DHT:
$566.07M
LNG:
$20.28B
DHT:
$268.69M
LNG:
$5.52B
DHT:
$450.13M
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHT vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
DHT
LNG
DHT vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHT | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.10 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 0.48 | +4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.76 | 0.90 | +9.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHT vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHT drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHT and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHT | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.12% | -97.84% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.18% | -24.09% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.96% | -24.87% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.44% | -24.87% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.56% | -57.53% | +17.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.33% | -12.69% | -51.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.31% | -43.08% | -33.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.19% | 12.88% | -5.69% |
Volatility
DHT vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) has a higher volatility of 16.06% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.89%. This indicates that DHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHT | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.06% | 7.89% | +8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.23% | 22.45% | +6.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.01% | 27.34% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.70% | 30.37% | +8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.66% | 32.28% | +9.38% |
Dividends
DHT vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
DHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.28%, more than LNG's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 8.28% | 6.06% | 10.76% | 11.72% | 1.35% | 2.50% | 25.81% | 2.42% | 2.04% | 5.57% | 17.15% | 6.55% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DHT vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DHT vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
DHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
DHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DHT and LNG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHT has higher volatility (16.06%) compared to LNG (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHT dropped -97.12% vs LNG's -97.84%.
DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHT and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer