DGS vs. FDIS
DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGS is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGS returned 10.14%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for FDIS. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.
Performance
DGS vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DGS has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 10.14%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
DGS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 14.94%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 25.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
FDIS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
DGS vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 14.94% | 21.18% | 1.13% | 19.08% | -12.35% | 15.33% | 4.06% | 18.90% | -16.52% | 37.47% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.01% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGS and FDIS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between DGS and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGS vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
DGS
FDIS
DGS vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGS | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.72 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 2.24 | +5.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGS vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGS | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -39.16% | -22.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | -15.50% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | -27.43% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -39.16% | +14.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -39.16% | -4.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -4.58% | +3.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -7.49% | -5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 5.01% | -1.96% |
Volatility
DGS vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 6.19%. This indicates that DGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGS | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 6.19% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 13.44% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 18.52% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.08% | 23.92% | -8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 22.32% | -4.93% |
DGS vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGS vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.20% | 3.45% | 3.36% | 4.55% | 5.34% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 4.24% | 2.81% | 3.42% | 3.28% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGS and FDIS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGS has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs FDIS's -39.16%.
On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 10.14% for DGS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.
DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.
DGS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.08% for FDIS.
DGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGS and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer