PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DGRC.TO vs. UDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 5 years, DGRC.TO returned 12.71%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for UDIV. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRC.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for UDIV.

Performance

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGRC.TO is traded in CAD, while UDIV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UDIV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRC.TO achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly lower than UDIV's 16.46% return.

DGRC.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
2.95%
YTD
14.54%
6M
14.94%
1Y
32.94%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
—

UDIV

1D
-0.28%
1M
8.17%
YTD
16.46%
6M
14.46%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF		14.54%27.20%12.36%7.79%-1.70%20.84%7.22%18.60%-3.85%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF		16.46%13.54%36.40%22.45%-8.94%18.58%3.76%18.47%-0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRC.TO and UDIV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRC.TO and UDIV has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DGRC.TO
UDIV

Energy

27.7%
3.7%

Financial Services

24.3%
11.3%

Industrials

16.1%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
8.7%

Basic Materials

8.0%
0.8%

Communication Services

1.7%
10.7%

Technology

1.2%
39.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
3.7%

Healthcare

-

7.4%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Energy

DGRC.TO
27.7%
UDIV
3.7%

Financial Services

DGRC.TO
24.3%
UDIV
11.3%

Industrials

DGRC.TO
16.1%
UDIV
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

DGRC.TO
10.7%
UDIV
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRC.TO
10.2%
UDIV
8.7%

Basic Materials

DGRC.TO
8.0%
UDIV
0.8%

Communication Services

DGRC.TO
1.7%
UDIV
10.7%

Technology

DGRC.TO
1.2%
UDIV
39.0%

Real Estate

DGRC.TO
0.1%
UDIV
3.7%

Healthcare

DGRC.TO

-

UDIV
7.4%

Utilities

DGRC.TO

-

UDIV
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF

Often compared with DGRC.TO:
DGRC.TO vs. VDY.TODGRC.TO vs. VYMDGRC.TO vs. RIT.TODGRC.TO vs. ISPA.DEDGRC.TO vs. PDC.TODGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DEDGRC.TO vs. SCHD
Often compared with UDIV:
UDIV vs. VYMUDIV vs. SCHDUDIV vs. HIDVUDIV vs. DDIVUDIV vs. DIVIUDIV vs. MBOXUDIV vs. LVHD

Return for Risk

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DGRC.TO
DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DGRC.TOUDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.86
3.03

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.88
4.01

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.58

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

5.13

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.77

20.40

+0.37

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the UDIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRC.TO and UDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DGRC.TOUDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

3.03

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.28

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.89

-0.07

Drawdowns

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than UDIV's maximum drawdown of -29.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and UDIV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DGRC.TOUDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.59%

-29.05%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-6.93%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-19.09%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-19.09%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-29.05%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.28%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-3.36%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.74%

-0.15%

Volatility

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) is 2.59%, while Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that DGRC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DGRC.TOUDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.93%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

8.92%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

11.76%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

13.63%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

14.52%

+0.21%

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison

DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than UDIV's 1.40% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF		2.41%2.58%2.46%2.56%2.48%1.87%3.06%2.20%1.63%0.00%0.00%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF		1.40%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

DGRC.TO and UDIV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for DGRC.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.06% for UDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRC.TO and UDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer