PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGRC.TO is traded in CAD, while VDIV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VDIV.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRC.TO achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than VDIV.DE's 9.37% return.


DGRC.TO

1D
0.42%
1M
2.95%
YTD
14.54%
6M
14.94%
1Y
32.94%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*

VDIV.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.15%
YTD
9.37%
6M
11.50%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
24.39%
5Y*
19.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF
14.54%27.20%12.36%7.79%-1.70%20.84%7.22%18.60%-2.67%
VDIV.DE
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
9.37%34.16%18.20%12.45%15.99%17.69%-4.67%15.42%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRC.TO and VDIV.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2018

0.45

The correlation between DGRC.TO and VDIV.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRC.TO
DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VDIV.DE
VDIV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VDIV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDIV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRC.TOVDIV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.50

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

5.85

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.77

18.53

+2.24

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the VDIV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRC.TO and VDIV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRC.TOVDIV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.76

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.61

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.07

-0.26

Drawdowns

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than VDIV.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and VDIV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRC.TOVDIV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.59%

-31.42%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

-4.96%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-15.96%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-15.96%

+0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-2.65%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-3.70%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.57%

+0.02%

Volatility

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) is 2.59%, while VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (VDIV.DE) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that DGRC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDIV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRC.TOVDIV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

3.01%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

7.54%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.58%

10.53%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.47%

12.05%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

14.31%

+0.42%

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than VDIV.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. VDIV.DE - Dividend Comparison

DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than VDIV.DE's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRC.TO
CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF
2.41%2.58%2.46%2.56%2.48%1.87%3.06%2.20%1.63%
VDIV.DE
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
4.88%3.58%4.19%4.97%4.56%3.97%4.11%4.35%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRC.TO and VDIV.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for VDIV.DE.

DGRC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while VDIV.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.38% for VDIV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRC.TO and VDIV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer