DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and 3466.HK (Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. Over the past year, DGRC.TO returned 32.94% vs 47.72% for 3466.HK. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRC.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for 3466.HK.

Performance

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DGRC.TO is traded in CAD, while 3466.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3466.HK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGRC.TO having a 14.54% return and 3466.HK slightly higher at 14.64%.

DGRC.TO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 32.94%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

3466.HK

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 1.66%
• YTD: 14.64%
• 6M: 11.60%
• 1Y: 47.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	14.54%	32.55%
3466.HK Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF	14.64%	46.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRC.TO and 3466.HK is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025	0.01

Return for Risk

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRC.TO

DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

3466.HK

3466.HK Risk / Return Rank: 90
3466.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
3466.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
3466.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 90
3466.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
3466.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGRC.TO	3466.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	3.36	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	4.33	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.56	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.52	6.82	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.77	18.21	+2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the 3466.HK Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRC.TO and 3466.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGRC.TO	3466.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	3.36	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	3.99	-3.17

Drawdowns

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than 3466.HK's maximum drawdown of -7.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and 3466.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRC.TO	3466.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.59%	-7.21%	-29.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	-7.21%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-1.45%	+1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-1.72%	-1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	2.67%	-1.08%

Volatility

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) is 2.59%, while Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF (3466.HK) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that DGRC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3466.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRC.TO	3466.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	3.47%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	10.23%	-1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	14.74%	-3.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.47%	14.78%	-2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.73%	14.78%	-0.05%

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than 3466.HK's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. 3466.HK - Dividend Comparison

DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than 3466.HK's 6.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
3466.HK Hang Seng High Dividend 30 Index ETF	6.85%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	2.41%	2.58%	2.46%	2.56%	2.48%	1.87%	3.06%	2.20%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRC.TO and 3466.HK in my portfolio?

DGRC.TO and 3466.HK have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DGRC.TO or 3466.HK?

On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRC.TO or 3466.HK?

DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for 3466.HK.

What is the main difference between DGRC.TO and 3466.HK?

They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Hang Seng Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.55% for 3466.HK.