PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSB vs. GGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSB vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.47% return.


DFSB

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.67%
6M
0.31%
YTD
0.89%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
10Y*

GGOV

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.40%
6M
3.01%
YTD
2.47%
1Y
0.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSB vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and GGOV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.58

The correlation between DFSB and GGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSB vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB
DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GGOV
GGOV Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
GGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSBGGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.01

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

0.00

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

0.01

+3.91

DFSB vs. GGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the GGOV Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSB and GGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and GGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSBGGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.69%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-4.69%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.34%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-1.54%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.12%

-1.12%

Volatility

DFSB vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) at 0.88%. This indicates that DFSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSBGGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

0.88%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

3.62%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91%

5.29%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.42%

5.18%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

5.18%

+0.24%

DFSB vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSB vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
4.35%3.46%4.35%5.27%0.41%
GGOV
iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSB and GGOV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSB has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to GGOV (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSB dropped -5.16% vs GGOV's -4.69%.

On 1-year performance, DFSB leads with 3.91% vs 0.02% for GGOV. On fees, DFSB is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, GGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFSB has performed better with a 3.91% return vs 0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSB is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.

DFSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSB and 0.39% for GGOV.

DFSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSB and GGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer