PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGOV vs. BCKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGOV vs. BCKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) and LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGOV achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than BCKT's 0.24% return.


GGOV

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.58%
YTD
2.73%
6M
2.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCKT

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGOV vs. BCKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GGOV and BCKT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025

0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGOV vs. BCKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) and LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GGOV vs. BCKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGOV vs. BCKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGOV drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, which is greater than BCKT's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGOV and BCKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGOVBCKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-1.00%

-3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.66%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-0.28%

-1.29%

Volatility

GGOV vs. BCKT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGOVBCKTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.29%

1.57%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.29%

1.57%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.29%

1.57%

+3.72%

GGOV vs. BCKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGOV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BCKT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGOV vs. BCKT - Dividend Comparison

GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.97%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GGOV and BCKT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCKT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCKT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.

BCKT has the higher dividend yield at 17.97%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

GGOV is categorized as Global Bonds, while BCKT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Stone Ridge. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GGOV and 0.25% for BCKT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGOV and BCKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer