DFSB vs. GABF
DFSB (Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFSB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSB returned 4.89%/yr vs 21.23%/yr for GABF. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFSB charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
DFSB vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -5.24% return.
DFSB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GABF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -5.24%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- -0.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFSB vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF | 1.12% | 5.22% | 2.45% | 9.37% | -0.77% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | -5.24% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -6.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSB and GABF is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSB vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
DFSB
GABF
DFSB vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSB | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | -0.06 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 0.04 | +1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.00 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | -0.07 | +1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | -0.16 | +4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSB | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | -0.06 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
DFSB vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum GABF drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSB | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -20.86% | +15.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -17.16% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.37% | -20.86% | +16.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -9.89% | +9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -4.85% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 7.23% | -6.26% |
Volatility
DFSB vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) is 1.61%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that DFSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSB | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 3.89% | -2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.11% | 13.02% | -9.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 17.26% | -13.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 20.53% | -15.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 20.53% | -15.07% |
DFSB vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFSB vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than GABF's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF | 3.60% | 3.46% | 4.35% | 5.27% | 0.41% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 2.07% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSB and GABF have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to DFSB (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSB dropped -5.16% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 21.23% vs 4.89% for DFSB. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DFSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 21.23% return vs 4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DFSB.
DFSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 2.07% for GABF.
DFSB is categorized as Global Bonds, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSB and 0.10% for GABF.
DFSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSB and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer