DFSB vs. DGCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFSB (Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF) and DGCB (Dimensional Global Credit ETF) are both Global Bonds funds from Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFSB returned 4.36% vs 6.04% for DGCB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSB charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DGCB.

Performance

DFSB vs. DGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than DGCB's 1.22% return.

DFSB

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: 4.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DGCB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 6.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSB vs. DGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF	0.84%	5.22%	2.45%	6.35%
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	1.22%	6.68%	3.80%	6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and DGCB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023	0.93

The correlation between DFSB and DGCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFSB vs. DGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB

DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 31
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 30
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 31

DGCB

DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 43
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 43
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. DGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.53	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	2.22	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.97	-0.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	6.93	-2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFSB vs. DGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the DGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSB and DGCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	1.53	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	1.47	-0.59

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. DGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than DGCB's maximum drawdown of -3.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and DGCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-3.50%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	-3.08%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-0.65%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	-0.80%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	0.87%	+0.10%

Volatility

DFSB vs. DGCB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) at 1.45%. This indicates that DFSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	1.45%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.10%	3.17%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.85%	3.97%	-0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.46%	4.82%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.46%	4.82%	+0.64%

DFSB vs. DGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DGCB's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFSB vs. DGCB - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than DGCB's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF	3.61%	3.46%	4.35%	5.27%	0.41%
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	3.22%	3.43%	4.72%	0.63%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFSB and DGCB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, DFSB and DGCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFSB or DGCB?

DFSB has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to DGCB (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSB dropped -5.16% vs DGCB's -3.50%.

Which ETF is better, DFSB or DGCB?

On 1-year performance, DGCB leads with 6.04% vs 4.36% for DFSB. On fees, DGCB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFSB or DGCB?

Over the 1-year period, DGCB has performed better with a 6.04% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFSB or DGCB?

DGCB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DFSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFSB or DGCB?

DFSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 3.22% for DGCB.

What is the main difference between DFSB and DGCB?

Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSB and 0.20% for DGCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.