DFSB vs. DGCB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB).

DFSB and DGCB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFSB is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 15, 2022. DGCB is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 7, 2023.

Performance

DFSB vs. DGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFSB vs. DGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF	-0.11%	5.22%	2.45%	6.35%
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	-0.19%	6.68%	3.80%	6.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than DGCB's -0.19% return.

DFSB

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -2.05%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DGCB

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSB vs. DGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DGCB's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DFSB

Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF

DGCB

Dimensional Global Credit ETF

Return for Risk

DFSB vs. DGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB

DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 47
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

DGCB

DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 57
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. DGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.06	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.48	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.20	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	1.60	-0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.55	5.56	-1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFSB vs. DGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSB Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the DGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSB and DGCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	1.06	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.45	-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and DGCB is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFSB vs. DGCB - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than DGCB's 2.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF	3.30%	3.46%	4.35%	5.27%	0.41%
DGCB Dimensional Global Credit ETF	2.85%	3.43%	4.72%	0.63%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. DGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than DGCB's maximum drawdown of -3.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and DGCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-3.50%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	-3.08%	+0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-2.04%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-0.77%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	0.88%	-0.03%

Volatility

DFSB vs. DGCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) is 1.95%, while Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) has a volatility of 2.15%. This indicates that DFSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFSB	DGCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	2.15%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	2.72%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	4.49%	-0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.50%	4.82%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.50%	4.82%	+0.68%