PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGOV vs. TMSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGOV vs. TMSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGOV achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than TMSF's 1.82% return.


GGOV

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.58%
YTD
2.73%
6M
2.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMSF

1D
0.05%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGOV vs. TMSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GGOV and TMSF is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGOV vs. TMSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GGOV vs. TMSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGOV vs. TMSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGOV drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, which is greater than TMSF's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGOV and TMSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGOVTMSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-2.28%

-2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.30%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-0.37%

-1.20%

Volatility

GGOV vs. TMSF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGOVTMSFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.29%

2.94%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.29%

2.94%

+2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.29%

2.94%

+2.35%

GGOV vs. TMSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGOV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSF's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGOV vs. TMSF - Dividend Comparison

GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GGOV and TMSF have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.

TMSF has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

GGOV is categorized as Global Bonds, while TMSF is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GGOV and 0.37% for TMSF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGOV and TMSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer