PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSB vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSB vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 9.45% return.


DFSB

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.89%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
10Y*

SCHX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.14%
YTD
9.45%
6M
8.85%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
21.28%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSB vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
1.25%5.22%2.45%9.37%-0.62%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
9.45%17.46%24.88%26.84%-3.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and SCHX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022

0.25

The correlation between DFSB and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSB vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB
DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSBSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.88

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

12.67

-8.56

DFSB vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSB and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSBSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-34.33%

+29.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-9.02%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.37%

-19.04%

+14.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.84%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-3.96%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

2.05%

-1.06%

Volatility

DFSB vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) is 1.17%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that DFSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSBSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

4.71%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

9.86%

-6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91%

12.60%

-8.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.45%

17.22%

-11.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.45%

18.20%

-12.75%

DFSB vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSB vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than SCHX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
3.60%3.46%4.35%5.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSB and SCHX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DFSB (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSB dropped -5.16% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 21.28% vs 4.90% for DFSB. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 21.28% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DFSB.

DFSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.

DFSB is categorized as Global Bonds, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSB and 0.03% for SCHX.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSB and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer