PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSB vs. DFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFSB vs. DFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFSB vs. DFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
-0.11%5.22%2.45%6.35%
DFGX
Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF
-0.35%3.46%3.75%4.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than DFGX's -0.35% return.


DFSB

1D
0.57%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.33%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
10Y*

DFGX

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFSB vs. DFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFSB vs. DFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB
DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DFGX
DFGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. DFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSBDFGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.71

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.26

1.00

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.92

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.55

3.61

+0.93

DFSB vs. DFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSB Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the DFGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSB and DFGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSBDFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.71

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.09

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and DFGX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFSB vs. DFGX - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than DFGX's 2.78% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
DFSB
Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF
3.30%3.46%4.35%5.27%0.41%
DFGX
Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF
2.78%2.84%4.61%0.49%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. DFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than DFGX's maximum drawdown of -3.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and DFGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSBDFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-3.32%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-3.32%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-2.47%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-0.70%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.85%

0.00%

Volatility

DFSB vs. DFGX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Dimensional Global Ex US Core Fixed Income ETF (DFGX) have volatilities of 1.95% and 1.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFSBDFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.99%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

2.69%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

4.45%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.50%

4.59%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

4.59%

+0.91%