DFSB vs. AVGB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB).

DFSB and AVGB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFSB is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 15, 2022. AVGB is an actively managed fund by Avantis. It was launched on Apr 15, 2025.

Performance

DFSB vs. AVGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFSB vs. AVGB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF	-0.11%	4.31%
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	-0.30%	4.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSB achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than AVGB's -0.30% return.

DFSB

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -2.05%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 4.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVGB

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: -0.30%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSB vs. AVGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSB has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGB's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DFSB

Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF

AVGB

Avantis Credit ETF

Return for Risk

DFSB vs. AVGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSB

DFSB Risk / Return Rank: 47
DFSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DFSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
DFSB Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DFSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DFSB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSB vs. AVGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF (DFSB) and Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFSB	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFSB	AVGB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	2.06	-1.19

Correlation

The correlation between DFSB and AVGB is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFSB vs. AVGB - Dividend Comparison

DFSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than AVGB's 3.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFSB Dimensional Global Sustainability Fixed Income ETF	3.30%	3.46%	4.35%	5.27%	0.41%
AVGB Avantis Credit ETF	3.50%	3.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DFSB vs. AVGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSB drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, which is greater than AVGB's maximum drawdown of -2.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSB and AVGB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFSB	AVGB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-2.12%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-1.50%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-0.25%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFSB	AVGB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	2.36%	+1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.50%	2.36%	+3.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.50%	2.36%	+3.14%