PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFLV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFLV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFLV achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 10.90% return.


DFLV

1D
-1.71%
1M
2.35%
YTD
14.80%
6M
16.17%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10Y*

VYM

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFLV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
14.80%15.90%12.88%12.31%-0.67%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.90%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DFLV and VYM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022

0.94

The correlation between DFLV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFLV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFLV
VYM

Financial Services

21.1%
20.5%

Energy

15.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

13.8%
12.2%

Industrials

13.5%
12.1%

Technology

12.5%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
6.7%

Basic Materials

7.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
8.1%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
0.0%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Financial Services

DFLV
21.1%
VYM
20.5%

Energy

DFLV
15.2%
VYM
9.8%

Healthcare

DFLV
13.8%
VYM
12.2%

Industrials

DFLV
13.5%
VYM
12.1%

Technology

DFLV
12.5%
VYM
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFLV
7.5%
VYM
6.7%

Basic Materials

DFLV
7.0%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

DFLV
4.7%
VYM
8.1%

Communication Services

DFLV
4.5%
VYM
3.5%

Real Estate

DFLV
0.4%
VYM
0.0%

Utilities

DFLV

-

VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFLV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFLV
DFLV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFLV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFLVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.44

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.01

3.78

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.08

14.19

+6.89

DFLV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFLV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFLVVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

2.45

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.51

+0.62

Drawdowns

DFLV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFLVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.80%

-56.98%

+40.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-6.69%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-14.46%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.82%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-7.19%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.78%

-0.22%

Volatility

DFLV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFLVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.08%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

7.73%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.35%

10.35%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

13.97%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

16.34%

-2.11%

DFLV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFLV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

DFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than VYM's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLV
Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF
1.42%1.61%1.65%1.72%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFLV and VYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFLV has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to VYM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLV dropped -16.80% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 3-year performance, DFLV leads with 18.88% vs 18.37% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFLV has performed better with a 18.88% return vs 18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFLV.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.42% for DFLV.

DFLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFLV and 0.04% for VYM.

DFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFLV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer